All versions use a 1.4L turbocharged four-cylinder engine and a six-speed automatic transmission. The former pair begin as front-drivers with an AWD option, while the Premier is AWD-only. The six-speed manual transmission that was part of last year's LS package is gone, leaving a six-speed automatic as the standard transmission in all trims.Ĭhevrolet sells the Trax in LS, LT and Premier trims. The 2017 model received a styling refresh, and we expect 2020 will be the last year for the current Trax, which may be redesigned into a new generation and renamed Trailblazer for 2021. The cavernous HR-V, which held four more carry-ons with the seats folded, is the pick of the subcompact-crossover litter for those who frequently carry large items.Introduced in 2013, the Trax was Chevrolet's first entry in the then-new subcompact crossover class. ![]() Still, we managed to fit 18 carry-on suitcases with the rear seats stowed. The Trax's cargo area is on the small side of its segment, and its rear seats aren't as easy to fold as they are in several competitors. Rivals including the Honda HR-V, the Jeep Renegade, and CX-3 offer all of the above features for less money. Only the top Premier model offers nicer amenities such as heated front seats and a sunroof, while automatic climate control isn't available at all. Venture further down the center stack, though, and you'll find cheap-feeling climate controls and cut-rate plastics around the shifter and center console. ![]() There are also some stitched dashboard inserts that help cultivate a more upscale look. The Trax comes standard with a well-integrated, easy-to-use touchscreen mounted at the top of the dashboard. Interior, Comfort, and CargoĪ high seating position and expansive headroom make the Trax's cabin feel airy and spacious, but it actually has less rear-seat room and cargo space than several of its competitors. The Soul not only achieved better fuel economy but also provided a whopping 63-hp advantage over the Trax and accelerated to 60 mph nearly three seconds quicker. The front-wheel-drive Trax underperformed in our highway fuel-economy test, falling short of its EPA number with a 29-mpg result. The Trax's drivetrain provides a subpar combination of fuel efficiency and acceleration that is worse than its rivals. There's not much variation among the Trax's competitive set in terms of fuel economy, both by the EPA's standards and in our real-world testing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |